Passage–1 Political theorists no doubt have to take history of injustice, for example, untouchability, seriously. The concept of historical injustice takes note of a variety of historical wrongs that continue into the present in some form or the other and tend to resist repair. Two reasons might account for resistance to repair. One, not only are the roots of injustice buried deep in history, injustice itself constitutes economic structures of exploitation, ideologies of discrimination and modes of representation. Two, the category of historical injustice generally extends across a number of wrongs such as economic deprivation, social discrimination and lack of recognition. This category is complex, not only because of the overlap between a number of wrongs, but because one or the other wrong, generally discrimination, tends to acquire partial autonomy from others. This is borne out by the history of repair in India. What is the main idea that we can infer from the passage?
- A.Untouchability in India has not been taken seriously by political theorists.
- B.Historical injustice is inevitable in any society and is always beyond repair.
- C.Social discrimination and deprivation have their roots in bad economies.
- D.It is difficult, if not impossible, to repair every manifestation of historical injustice.
Explanation
The history of injustice is deep-rooted in India. This system of injustice is a mix of discriminatory ideologies, the economic structure of exploitation and lack of recognition. Mode of representation like caste, religion or gender also creates injustice. The author is hinting that the injustice that started in past continues to date due to its amalgamation with Indian ethos. It is not difficult to repair every manifestation of historical injustice. For example, women reservations and minorities reservation can lead to repair injustice done to these groups in past but the attitude of all people cannot be changed.